← Blog | 2026-03-30 | By Matt Berman | Reviewed by Jean Luc

Identity vs Utility: Why the Best-Performing Ads Never Mention the Product

After analyzing 800+ ads from Ridge, AG1, Liquid Death, and more — identity ads consistently crush utility ads. Here's the psychology and a 3-question test.

I analyzed 800+ ads from 5 brands worth a combined $3B+.

The highest-performing ads — the ones with the longest run times, the biggest spend, the most staying power — almost never mention the product’s features.

They don’t talk about specs. They don’t list benefits. They don’t explain how the thing works.

They sell something way more powerful: identity.

The Two Ways to Sell Anything

Every ad you’ve ever seen falls into one of two categories:

UTILITY: “This wallet holds 12 cards and blocks RFID signals.”

IDENTITY: “For the man who gets things done.”

Utility speaks to your brain. It triggers the prefrontal cortex — the logical, comparison-shopping, “is this really worth it?” part of your mind.

Identity speaks to who you think you are. It triggers the amygdala — the emotional, belonging-seeking, “this is ME” part of your mind.

One leads to comparison shopping. The other leads to immediate action.

Because you can’t comparison-shop who you ARE.

The Evidence: 5 Brands, 800+ Ads

Ridge Wallet — Pure Identity ($200M+)

Ridge has 34 active Meta ads at any given time. Their top performer has been running 37 days straight with just 12 words of copy.

But the real pattern shows up when you look at which ads KEEP running — meaning which ones keep spending because they keep converting:

  • “For the man who gets things done.”
  • “Designed for doers.”
  • “Carry less. Do more.”

Not a single spec. Not one feature. Not one mention of how many cards it holds or what metal it’s made from.

Pure identity. $200M+ in revenue.

Bellroy — The Identity-Adjacent Approach

Same product category. Wallets. Different approach.

Bellroy leads with: “The slim wallet that fits your life.”

It’s still identity-adjacent — “fits your life” is about you, not the wallet. But notice the subtle difference:

Ridge says who you ARE. (“For the man who gets things done.”) Bellroy says what the product DOES for you. (“Fits your life.”)

Ridge is at $200M+. Bellroy is a fraction of that.

Same product. Different psychology. Massively different outcome.

AG1 — Identity as the Lead Angle

AG1 sells one product: a scoop of green powder. They run 6 completely different psychological angles simultaneously (which we break down fully in The Angle Matrix).

But their identity ads outperform everything else:

“Good morning, athletes everywhere.”

If you see yourself as an athlete — even casually — this ad was made for you. AG1 isn’t selling supplements. They’re selling membership in a tribe.

The identity angle works here because it bypasses the biggest objection to greens powders: “Does this actually do anything?” Instead of trying to prove efficacy (a losing battle against skeptics), they sidestep the question entirely. “You’re an athlete. Athletes take AG1. Therefore…”

The logic is circular. And it works beautifully.

Liquid Death — Identity as Religion ($1.4B)

Liquid Death took identity advertising to its logical extreme.

$1.4 billion. Selling canned water.

Their ads don’t mention hydration. Not once. No minerals. No pH levels. No purity claims. No health benefits.

Every single ad sells one thing: “You’re the kind of person who drinks Liquid Death.”

Their merch outsells most clothing brands. People get the logo tattooed on their bodies.

That’s not utility advertising. That’s not even identity advertising. That’s building a religion.

And it proves the ultimate identity advertising thesis: when the identity is strong enough, the product becomes irrelevant. People aren’t buying water. They’re buying tribal membership.

HexClad — When Utility Actually Wins

Here’s the nuance that most “sell identity!” advice misses.

HexClad built a $500M business selling cookware. And their best-performing ads are heavily utility-focused. Specs. Testimonials. Technical explanations. Trust signals.

Why? Because their category has a different trust dynamic. (We explore this in The Empty Copy Paradox — the trust gap framework explains when utility outperforms identity.)

The lesson: identity isn’t always the answer. But when it IS the answer, it’s the most powerful tool in advertising.

The Neuroscience: Why Identity Beats Utility

This isn’t just a pattern from ad libraries. It’s backed by neuroscience.

Utility ads trigger the prefrontal cortex — the brain’s rational processing center. This is where comparison happens. “12 cards… but my current wallet holds 8, and that’s enough.” Logic creates alternatives.

Identity ads trigger the amygdala — the brain’s emotional processing center. This is where belonging happens. “Am I a doer? Yes. This is for doers. This is for me.” Emotion creates urgency.

Research by Antonio Damasio (USC) showed that patients with damaged amygdalae — people who processed everything logically — were actually WORSE at making purchase decisions. They’d analyze forever and never buy.

Emotion isn’t the enemy of good decision-making. It’s the engine.

The Trap: Why Most Brands Fail at Identity Advertising

Here’s where it goes wrong.

Every marketing team has read “sell the identity, not the product.” So they write copy like:

  • “Live your best life.”
  • “Unlock your potential.”
  • “Join the movement.”

That’s not identity advertising. That’s a greeting card.

Real identity advertising is specific.

“For the man who gets things done” works because it describes a specific person. You can picture him. You either are him or you’re not.

“Live your best life” describes everyone. Which means it describes no one.

The specificity is the mechanism. When an identity is too broad, nobody recognizes themselves in it. When it’s specific, the people who DO recognize themselves feel like the ad was written for them — and the exclusion of everyone else makes it feel more valuable.

The Identity Ad Test: 3 Questions

Before you run your next identity ad, put it through this filter:

1. Can your customer PICTURE the person in the ad?

If not, the identity is too vague. “For the man who gets things done” — you can see him. He’s organized, moves fast, doesn’t tolerate clutter. “Live your best life” — you can’t see anyone specific.

2. Would someone feel EXCLUDED if they don’t fit?

If not, it’s too broad. Ridge’s “for doers” explicitly excludes… non-doers? Lazy people? Doesn’t matter. The exclusion makes the included feel special. If your identity includes literally everyone, it doesn’t work.

3. Does the ad work with ZERO product shown?

If not, you’re still selling utility. Ridge’s “For the man who gets things done” works without showing the wallet. Liquid Death’s vibe works without showing the can. If removing the product image breaks the ad, the heavy lifting is being done by utility, not identity.

Ridge passes all three. Liquid Death passes all three. “Live your best life” fails all three.

When to Use Identity vs Utility

Identity advertising isn’t always the right play. Here’s a rough guide:

FactorLeans IdentityLeans Utility
Product is visual/recognizableYes
Low consideration / impulse priceYes
Category is well-understoodYes
Brand is already knownYes
Product has invisible benefitsYes
High AOV / considered purchaseYes
Skeptical category (health, finance)Yes
New brand / unknownYes

Most products need both — identity to create desire, utility to close the deal. The question is which leads.

Ridge leads with identity, sprinkles in utility. HexClad leads with utility, wraps it in trust signals. AG1 runs both simultaneously through separate campaigns.

Start Analyzing Identity vs Utility in Any Brand’s Ads

We built StealAds to pull any brand’s live ad library and decode the psychological patterns behind their strategy.

See which brands lean identity. Which lean utility. And what’s working right now.

Try StealAds →

Written by
Matt Berman
Founder, StealAds
Reviewed by
Jean Luc
Editorial Review
Published
2026-03-30
Updated 2026-04-02

About the author

Matt Berman is the founder of StealAds and CEO of Emerald Digital. He has spent two decades building marketing systems, studying ad psychology, and turning market signal into creative direction.

Editorial standard

This post was reviewed for product-truth accuracy, claim discipline, and search-intent fit before publication.